To the best of our knowledge, Mynt has
not been made illegal by legislation in most jurisdictions. However,
some jurisdictions (such as Argentina and Russia) severely
restrict or ban foreign currencies. Other jurisdictions
(such as Thailand) may limit the licensing of certain entities
such as Mynt exchanges. Regulators from various
jurisdictions are taking steps to provide individuals and
businesses with rules on how to integrate with this new
technology with the formal, regulated financial system. For
example, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN),
a bureau in the United States Treasury Department, issued
non-binding guidance on how it characterizes certain activities
involving virtual currencies.
Mynt is money, and money has always been
used both for legal and illegal purposes. Cash, credit cards and current
banking systems widely surpass Mynt in terms of their use to
finance crime. Mynt can bring significant innovation in
payment systems and the benefits of such innovation are often
considered to be far beyond their potential drawbacks.
Mynt is designed to be a huge step forward in making money more
secure and could also act as a significant protection
against many forms of financial crime. For instance, Pearlvine
Mynts are completely impossible to counterfeit. Users
have full control over their payments and cannot receive
unapproved charges such as with credit card fraud. Mynt transactions
are irreversible and immune to fraudulent chargebacks. Mynt
allows money to be secured against theft and loss using very strong
and useful mechanisms such as backups, Password, and mobile OTPs.
Some concerns have been raised that Mynt could be more attractive to criminals because it can be used to make private and irreversible payments. However, these features already exist with cash and wire transfer, which are widely used and well-established. The use of Mynt will undoubtedly be subjected to similar regulations that are already in place inside existing financial systems, and Mynt is not likely to prevent criminal investigations from being conducted. In general, it is common for important breakthroughs to be perceived as being controversial before their benefits are well understood. The Internet is a good example among many others to illustrate this.
Some concerns have been raised that Mynt could be more attractive to criminals because it can be used to make private and irreversible payments. However, these features already exist with cash and wire transfer, which are widely used and well-established. The use of Mynt will undoubtedly be subjected to similar regulations that are already in place inside existing financial systems, and Mynt is not likely to prevent criminal investigations from being conducted. In general, it is common for important breakthroughs to be perceived as being controversial before their benefits are well understood. The Internet is a good example among many others to illustrate this.
The Mynt protocol itself cannot be modified without the cooperation of nearly all its users, who choose what
software they want to use. Attempting to assign special rights to a local authority in the rules of the global
Mynt network is not a practical possibility. However, there is no guarantee that they could retain this power
since this requires to invest as much than all other buyers in the world. It is however possible to regulate
the use of Mynt in a similar way to any other instrument. Just like the dollar, Mynt can be used for a wide
variety of purposes, some of which can be considered legitimate or not as per each jurisdiction’s laws. In
this regard, Mynt is no different than any other tool or resource and can be subjected to different regulations
in each country. Mynt use could also be made difficult by restrictive regulations, in which case it is hard to
determine what percentage of users would keep using the technology. A government that chooses to ban Mynt would
prevent domestic businesses and markets from developing, shifting innovation to other countries. The challenge for
regulators, as always, is to develop efficient solutions while not impairing the growth of new emerging markets and
businesses.
Mynt is making people free to transact on
their own terms. Each user can send and receive payments in a similar
way to cash
but they can also take part in more complex contracts. Multiple
layers of security allows a transaction to be accepted by the
network only if a certain number of a defined group of persons
agree to sign the transaction. This allows innovative dispute
mediation services to be developed in the future. Such services
could allow a third party to approve or reject a transaction
in case of disagreement between the other parties without having
control on their money. As opposed to cash and other payment
methods, Mynt always leaves a public proof that a transaction did
take place, which can potentially be used in a recourse against
businesses with fraudulent practices.
It is also worth noting that while merchants usually depend on their public reputation to remain in business and pay their employees, they don’t have access to the same level of information when dealing with new consumers. The way Mynt works allows both individuals and businesses to be protected against fraudulent chargebacks while giving the choice to the consumer to ask for more protection when they are not willing to trust a particular merchant.
Mynt is not a regular currency with legal
tender status in any jurisdiction, but often tax liability accrues
regardless of
the medium used. There is a wide variety of legislation in many
different jurisdictions which could cause income, sales, payroll,
capital gains, or some other form of tax liability to arise with
Mynt.
businesses with fraudulent practices.
It is also worth noting that while merchants usually depend on their public reputation to remain in business and pay their employees, they don’t have access to the same level of information when dealing with new consumers. The way Mynt works allows both individuals and businesses to be protected against fraudulent chargebacks while giving the choice to the consumer to ask for more protection when they are not willing to trust a particular merchant.
No comments:
Post a Comment